Bibliographic Citation
Document | For copies of Journal Articles, please contact the Publisher or your local public or university library and refer to the information in the Resource Relation field. For copies of other documents, please see the Availability, Publisher, Research Organization, Resource Relation and/or Author (affiliation information) fields and/or Document Availability. |
---|---|
Title | Scale and centralization in energy systems |
Creator/Author | Lovins, A.B. |
Publication Date | 1976 Dec 01 |
OSTI Identifier | OSTI ID: 7325228 |
Other Number(s) | CODEN: PENRB |
Resource Type | Journal Article |
Resource Relation | Prof. Eng. (Wash., D.C.) ; Vol/Issue: 47:12; From a paper presented at the Future Strategies of Energy Development symposium in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, October 1976 |
Subject | 290100 -- Energy Planning & Policy-- Energy Analysis & Modeling ;290200 -- Energy Planning & Policy-- Economics & Sociology ;530100 -- Environmental-Social Aspects of Energy Technologies-- Social & Economic Studies-- (-1989); ;ENERGY SOURCE DEVELOPMENT-- SIZE;ENERGY SOURCES-- SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;POWER SYSTEMS-- SIZE; EFFICIENCY;ENERGY CONSUMPTION |
Description/Abstract | Arguments usually articulated in favor of large-scale energy systems include: reduced unit capital cost; increased reliability; central high-volume delivery of primary fuel; ability to use and finance the best high technologies available; and several others.^While admitting that these contentions are not devoid of merit, Mr. Lovins suggests that ``many of the advantages claimed for large scale may be doubtful, illusory, tautological, or outweighed by less tangible and less quantifiable but perhaps more important disadvantages and diseconomies.`` As an example, he cites the fact that large electrical generators often lose in reliability what their size gains in unit cost; and that there is mounting evidence that most types of power stations can have lower busbar costs in sizes of order 10/sup 8/ W than of 10/sup 9/ W. A further diseconomy of large scale, from a security standpoint, is that central energy systems reliant on a few large facilities are more vulnerable, and harder to restore when damaged, than dispersed systems.^Other examples of the potential technical and economic advantages of small scale are cited.^Many of the points of this paper were drawn from Mr. Lovins` article in the October issue of Foreign Affairs, ``Energy Strategy: The Road Not Taken`` (for abstract, see EAPA 3:566).^(LMT) |
Country of Publication | United States |
Language | English |
Format | Pages: 25-27 |
System Entry Date | 2001 May 13 |
Top |